.
Feedback

Election 2012: Measure B1 Just Shy of 2/3 Vote Needed to Pass

Alameda County transportation tax measure falls just shy of 66.6 percent vote mark needed to pass, according to unofficial results.

Unofficial results show a proposed measure to extend a current half-cent sale tax hike and add an additional half-cent to help pay for transportation projects fell just short of the 66.6 percent vote it needed to pass.

Measure B1 finished with 65.54 percent of the vote, according to unofficial results from the Alameda County registrar.

Further details from the measure's official statement:

This measure seeks voter approval of an ordinance that provides for the following three items: (1) an extension in perpetuity of the existing one-half of one percent (0.5%) transactions and use tax for transportation purposes, currently set to expire in March of 2022; (2) an increase to the transactions and use tax by one-half of one percent (0.5%) resulting in a total tax of one percent (1%); and (3) the Alameda County Transportation Commission’s (“Commission”) authority to issue limited tax bonds.

Here's a breakdown of how the funding would be spent, according to the Alameda County Transportation Expenditure Plan (TEP) — nearly $7.8 billion in investments that would be funded over the next 30 years:

  • 48 percent of the tax proceeds will fund public and specialized
    transit
  • 30 percent of the tax proceeds will fund improvements to local streets and roads
  • 9 percent of the tax proceeds will be spent on highway efficiency and freight development
  • 8 percent of the tax proceeds will be used for bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure
  • 5 percent of the tax proceeds will fund sustainable land use and transportation projects.

Measure B1 supporters say:

Alameda County residents need reliable and efficient transportation options for a better quality of life, stronger economy, and cleaner environment. The continuation and extension of this measure will allow critical transportation projects to move ahead uninterrupted.

Further details at http://www.YesonB1.com.

Opponents say:

This measure increases taxes on all income levels. It puts control of transportation decisions in the hands of Alameda County Transportation Commission (ACTC) who will use their taxing authority and resources to fund inefficient, expensive, and underutilized public transportation systems at the expense of automobile drivers.

Further information at http://www.VoteNoMeasureB1.com.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Livermore Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Robert May 25, 2013 at 01:35 am
I agree here....the new layout for Livermore Patch is HORRIBLE!!!!FOR MANY REASONS!!!! HERE'S MYRead More DEAL....EITHER CHANGE IT BACK TO THE LAYOUT IT HAD OR I WILL LEAVE...
Scanner guy May 24, 2013 at 11:31 pm
Short and sweet , it sucks big time!!!!! I rarely go on the patch anymore, it's got way to muchRead More going on, whoever thought up this format thought wrong, bring back the old patch. All the negative comments here need to taken into consideration!!
Stefanie Pruegel May 23, 2013 at 08:02 pm
I agree with My2Cents that news and opinion (blogs) should be separate sections. For me to post anRead More actual news item, I can either start a blog which seems more appropriate for commentary, or post an announcement that will be buried in between lost cats, yard sales and other personal posts. The only way to get news into the news section is to have an editor pick it up, but with the onslaught of information and shortage of editors - many of them handling several Patch sites - chances are slim.
Livermore Bulb
Autumn Johnson (Editor) May 21, 2013 at 08:27 pm
i love the passion people show in Livermore! Thanks for posting. Luckily, it was not burnt out.Read More http://livermore.patch.com/groups/breaking-news/p/worlds-longest-burning-light-bulb-out-but-only-overnight
John Marchand May 21, 2013 at 06:31 pm
The light bulb is back on. Ironically, it was a device that was installed to protect the bulb fromRead More power surges that failed. When the bulb was reconnected to unfiltered power, it came back on.
Californicated1 May 22, 2013 at 03:21 pm
About the only electric vehicle I would consider buying is one that did not require charging off ofRead More any other sources other than its own--meaning that it charges its own batteries, either thorough motion while it's on the road or through something like solar cells charging up the batteries and keeping them charged, even when the car is parked and it's sitting in a parking lot on a sunny day--until that happens, no electric vehicle is going to be practical outside of anything other than short trips or the commute. And as for how you got your vehicle, are there any other "carrots" out there that can be dangled in front of you so you can follow them, even into the oblivion known as electric vehicles that require charging from a source that is not part of your vehicle--because that sounds stupid and foolish to me. It sounds more like it is somebody's Pavlovian experiment to change our behavior if we buy the electric cars being marketed out there instead of waiting for the next generation of technology out there, the kind that won't require charging up the batteries or keeping them charged with plugging into an external electricity source. Before I would consider purchasing an electric vehicle, it should be self-charging so that a trans-continental driving trip could be sustained and made without worrying about running the batteries down and taking extra time to charge them up.
Sean McMenamin May 21, 2013 at 10:59 am
as well take advantage of it. What I'm talking about is a reasonable rate for charging that isRead More within going rates, not the usurious rates charged by certain companies. I always love the hundred yard heroes who hide behind a false screen name
Sean McMenamin May 21, 2013 at 10:56 am
I'm not a greenie.....the only reason we leased one is, because of the tax loophole on the taxes weRead More already pay, we have an essentially free car for a couple of years. Maybe you're just upset because you weren't smart enough to figure that out and take advantage of it. Just like everyone with their solar panels; if we're all forced to pay for it, you may
Annie May 19, 2013 at 01:18 pm
Seriously? AFGAHN food? Why can't we just get a Red Lobster or something?
Scanner guy May 18, 2013 at 02:05 pm
its going to be an afghan restaurant
Eric Plummer May 18, 2013 at 09:57 am
Rafael and his crew do great work, and not just lawn service. He replaced our sprinkler system andRead More sodded two new lawns when we moved into our house. He and his crew have trimmed trees, planted flowers, and even built a new fence and gate. All at a fair price. I can't recommend his services enough.