.
Feedback

Is Google Plus the New Facebook?

Google Plus is the new invitation-only social media kid on the block that wants to knock Facebook off the mountain. It has some significant advantages that Facebook can only dream about. Should you switch?

If you haven't heard of it, in a new battle of Goliaths, Google launched Google Plus (or Google+) recently in a head-to-head against Facebook. Facebook of course, is the seemingly unstoppable social media giant with about 1/10th of the planet's population as part of their network.

I can hear the groans now. Yes, there's another social media platform to learn.

So should you dump Facebook and switch? In a word, no, at least not yet. Is Google+ compelling? Yes.

But as a friend of mine posted (on Google+), "Can't decide: Is Google+ like arriving early to party where it's just you and the nerds? Or like staying late with just the cool people?"

I'm sort of in the same camp. I managed to get an invitation to join Google Wave a year or so ago, and the silence was absolutely deafening. It definitely had some really cool features that I hope to see in Google+ someday. But there were so few people on the system, you just couldn't do anything. Google eventually dumped it.

Google+, on the other hand, reportedly has more than 10 million users (probably many more as of this writing), so it's fun to see people popping up on the system.

Ironically, the other day, Google+ even suggested Mark Zuckerberg (the founder of Facebook) to me as a possible connection. Was this a joke, or is Zuckerberg really a user of Google+, their arch rival?

Alas, yes, you still have to have an invitation to join, because Google says they're still working out the kinks of the system before opening it up to the entire world. I suspect this is probably a bit of supply and demand - limit the supply, and demand goes up, right?

Compare Google+ to Facebook

Google+ has many of the same features as Facebook, so it's pretty easy to get going. You can create photo albums, update your status to tell your friends, comment, tag things, all pretty basic social media stuff.

There the systems part ways. Unlike its counterpart, Google has done a good job of making their permissions easy to manage. Don't want groups of people to see your phone number? No problem, it's easy to set.

Right out of the gate, you are given several "circles" to put friends in. These circles are kind of like Facebook groups. You have to categorize people into a circle, and then you can set the permissions based on the circles.

In a blog post I wrote about Facebook security for professionals almost exactly a year ago, I advocated having a group called "People I Don't Know", and limiting their permissions. Same thing in Google+: I created a circle called "People I Don't Know", and guess what? They can't see stuff I don't want them to see.

Another difference is that anyone can put you into their circle - kind of like Twitter, where anyone can follow you. You don't have to follow them back in Twitter, and in Google+, you don't have to put them in one of your circles either. If you don't put them in a circle, they'll only see what the public can see, and nothing more.

Google's awkward parlance is kind of like ordering a latte at a certain popular coffee shop. In Facebook, you "like" something. In Google+, you "+1" it. Urgh. That's a verb? If you want to be interested in something on Google+, you create "Sparks". Really? Sounds like more like dating.

Oh, and I'll have a triple shot, venti, flat, caramel macchiato with that please.

Google+ for Businesses

If you're looking to use Google+ as the next great thing to market your business, sorry, but you're going to have to wait. Right now, there is no business functionality at all (not even ads). You can only use it with your own personal profile.

Anyone who is caught creating a business profile on Google+ is getting dumped. Google is actively going after ids like this, and shutting them down. They say they plan to have the business functionality up in a few months.

In response to this, Facebook has launched their new Facebook for Business portal as a way of thumbing their nose, right back at Google. It's really not a portal, but more of a "Here's what you can do to market yourself on Facebook" type of thing.

Is Google+ ready for prime time?

Google+ definitely has some cool stuff, and a lot of growing up to do before it knocks Facebook off as king of the hill. It's got a nice clean interface, and I like the ease of setting up circles.

It does have one HUGE advantage over Facebook, however. If you have any type of Gmail or other Google account (and practically who doesn't these days), anytime you go to Google the search engine, you'll see the little red reminder icon in the top right corner. Guess what? You're already logged in. There's no switching to another browser just to get your social media fix for the day.

Until they come up with their own search engine, Facebook just can't beat that one with a stick.

Bill Davis August 2, 2011 at 10:54 am
Great post on the virtues and vices of g+, Tom! I am using it, too, and wholeheartedly agree with you on all of your points. One thing you didn't mention that is really cool is the "hangout" -- you can simply "hang out" with your web cam on, and as friends drop by, they can hang out with you. It's sort of like an impromptu web conference, limited to 10 people at a time. As people leave, others can come in.
It's a pretty nifty feature of g+.
Thomas Petty August 2, 2011 at 11:02 am
Thanks, Bill. I'll have to come hang out with you. :)
Green August 2, 2011 at 11:34 am
Tom, G+ is a porn nightmare, with all due respect. Anyone can add you. This means Anyone can make a profile called "Big Sexxxy" off a new gmail address, and then blithely add the entire planet. It's the burden of me the end user to repetitively block these porn spammers. Gmail doesn't make me deal with porn or spam - but G+ does. Why?
Bill Davis August 2, 2011 at 11:44 am
@Green, I have yet to see ONE BIT of porn on G+. Maybe THAT'S why there aren't 10 BILLION users already! It's quite easy to nip this stuff in the bud.
David August 2, 2011 at 11:53 am
This is inaccurate: "Right out of the gate, you are given several "circles" to put friends in. These circles are kind of like Facebook groups."
Circles are the equivalent of FB friend lists, which ALREADY allow you to say "post this to these people" or "exclude these people from this post".
Thomas Petty August 2, 2011 at 12:13 pm
David, you are correct - I used the wrong term. Thanks for the catch. However, most people don't use the friend lists to filter their information or are completely unaware of the feature, which was the reason for the blog post referenced above. G+ does this for you with the circles.
Chastom2 August 2, 2011 at 09:06 pm
I would like to try it out but I can't seem to get an invite.
LookupPage August 9, 2011 at 09:52 am
I think that Google+ is providing new food for thought for the social networking professional community. The idea of having more personalized privacy settings is a big plus, especially for reputation management professionals and companies like ours, LookupPage (http://www.lookuppage.com). The idea of having to move to another social network is a bit daunting for people, but I think that it could provide a whole new, more manageable space for professional people.
Technology Guy August 10, 2011 at 12:46 pm
It cracks me up when everyone fawns and admires something from Google. Take 10 minutes and read this article...http://www.infoworld.com/d/the-industry-standard/are-googles-best-days-behind-it-168900?source=footer
Google is an advertising company trying to find another technology. They are only 7% of the email market (behind Outlook, Yahoo, Hotmail and Apple mail). Wave is one of many examples of these types of attempts. I predict this will also fail. Granted - I have some bias as a competitor - but articles and comments like this make me laugh. Whats the sincerest form of flatery?
Bill Davis August 10, 2011 at 01:08 pm
It's just another avenue for social media. I like choice. I like being able to say to Facebook (or any other company, for that matter): "You're not the only game in town. Give me a better experience; otherwise, I move."
Think how awesome that power of freedom of choice is.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Livermore Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Carol Wright June 19, 2013 at 10:17 am
Meeting is on Jun 20th.
Kathleen Schoening June 19, 2013 at 05:11 pm
You can also attend if you are part of the Neighborhood Watch. It was the Neighborhood Watch whoRead More negotiated having the Mayor come to the Springtown HOA meeting.
Nika Megino (Editor) June 17, 2013 at 10:59 am
Hi Christian! Sorry for the trouble! I've gone in and reapproved your posts. I did, however, deleteRead More the duplicates. Please let me know if you have any more trouble with posting, and again, sorry for the inconvenience with our Spambot!
Christian Holm June 17, 2013 at 04:04 pm
Thanks, Nika! I truly appreciate your efforts. I just wish the software would get fixed.
Bridget Carney June 15, 2013 at 10:10 pm
Hi Penelope! I am interested in finding out more about your puppies. Please e-mail me atRead More bridget.carney@gmail.com
Cindy Eckel June 14, 2013 at 08:01 am
Did you try 'Pleasanton Rentals' in Pleasanton...I know you asked for Livermore but this place hasRead More it all!
DeAnna Senft McDaid June 14, 2013 at 12:44 pm
Thank you Cindy I'll give them a call. apprecitate you taking the time.
DeAnna Senft McDaid June 19, 2013 at 01:22 pm
Settled on Partyland. One bottle of free blue syrup with the rental too. Nice touch. Thank you forRead More the tip. It will be a fun party with this little addition! :-)
Abby and Buddy
Beatrice Karnes June 13, 2013 at 08:48 am
They are beautiful and you described them so well! I hope that someone steps forward quickly! (IRead More have my quota of cats already.)
TrueRealist June 12, 2013 at 06:35 pm
It isn't up to the gov. to help raise your kids. The stork didn't drop the kid off unexpectedly. IfRead More you can't afford kids then don't have them.
barbieann June 13, 2013 at 08:39 am
Wow, so quick to jump to conclusions and judge. Maybe T.G. BUYS the child's lunch. Every schoolRead More sells hot lunch every day. At the majority of our schools, more lunches are bought than given for free.
DeAnna Senft McDaid June 13, 2013 at 12:43 pm
The schools give us 2 options as parents. 1. Buying lunches on campus or 2. Send them with a lunch.Read More Clearly the author of this chose number 1 and the school was OUT leaving the child with NO 3rd option. Shame on that school.
Jason Morgan June 9, 2013 at 09:33 pm
A great issue! However, the rodeo is nothing but animal cruelty wrapped up as "tradition"Read More and "entertainment". Why would the animal's welfare become a concern now? Rodeo performers have been documented beating, kicking, and shocking normally docile cows and horses in chutes and holding pens. "Bucking broncos" and steers are provoked with electric prods, sharp sticks, caustic ointments, and the pinching "bucking" strap, which is what really makes them jump, they are not "wild" and "dangerous" . The cowboys earn points by spurring the bucking horse. I have seen them up close and many are bleeding. Calves, roped when running, have their necks snapped back by the lasso, often resulting in neck and back injuries, bruises, broken bones, and internal bleeding. After their short and painful "careers," animals in rodeos are sent to the slaughterhouse. Dr. C.G. Haber, a veterinarian who spent 30 years as a federal meat inspector, describes the animals discarded from rodeos for slaughter as being "so extensively bruised that the only areas in which the skin was attached [to the flesh] was the head, neck, leg, and belly. I have seen animals with six to eight ribs broken from the spine and, at times, puncturing the lungs. I have seen as much as 2 to 3 gallons of free blood accumulated under the detached skin." Every national animal protection organization opposes rodeos because of their inherent cruelty. Don't feel bad everyone, I used to love the rodeo too. Before I knew better...
Bonbrwneyes June 10, 2013 at 09:13 pm
Something to consider and not pushing it aside because I feel its unimportant, but what I'd love toRead More have access to is how the riders that were hurt are doing today. Two bull riders got gored, one in the back and he was down and out for a bit and then obviously not "okay" as he stumbled out of the arena and then another that got his leg hurt and he couldn't get himself over the gate on his own. Left saturday's Rodeo hoping they were okay and would love follow up if at all possible. Thanks!