Door Shuts on New Theater

With Redevelopment Agencies Dissolved, Funds No Longer Available

Supporters of the in Livermore got some bad news as the year drew to a close last week.

There won’t be any available to pay for it.

On Thursday the state Supreme Court upheld the legislature’s vote to dissolve the agencies, and struck down a bill that provided a loophole for the agency to continue funding projects.

The redevelopment agencies use a portion of property tax money to partner with developers to revitalize blighted arenas. Apparently, downtown Livermore was designated as blighted. That kind of government money going into redevelopment makes sense when it comes to poor, especially urban, areas where developers would be reluctant to risk money. One large-scale success story is the San Diego Gaslamp Quarter.

When I was growing up in San Diego, that area was a danger zone best avoided even during the daylight hours. Now it’s a bustling area highly attractive to tourists and locals alike.

But funding a theater in the downtown Livermore when a nice, albeit smaller theater, already exists? That does not seem to fulfill the spirit of the redevelopment plan, although it complied with the law.

These plans for a plush new theater come at a time when school districts struggle to offer fewer and fewer services from adequately funded GATE programs to arts education. Many city employees have had limited or no raises and work furloughs digging into their pockets. And these, among other fiscal concerns, need to be addressed.

The sad fact is that redevelopment agencies may be a luxury tax payers can no longer afford. The money that would have gone into these agencies — about $1 billion — is being redirected to schools, public safety and city general funds.

The Livermore city council voted in May 2009 to build a larger regional theater downtown. The plan was to have redevelopment agency money paying about two-thirds of the estimated $184 million price tag.

Many Livermore residents were up in arms when the city council opted to use the to back bonds to pay for the theater.

In the past, I’ve been an agnostic when it comes to the new theater. There are pros and cons, with the biggest item in the no column being the cost of a new theater that won’t be able to pay its own way.

The fights to fill seats, and most tickets are priced out of reach of many residents. Theater has never been a cheap entertainment option, and bringing in big entertainment names equals putting up big bucks.

Some folks have questioned whether Livermore could draw top drawer entertainers. The truth is you can get almost any performer for a price — even Grammy winners often play private parties and corporate gigs — but that doesn’t mean getting cheeks in the seats. 

It was a risky proposal when the Livermore City Council voted to use our general fund to back the bonds needed to build the planned theater. Most investors wouldn’t go near the bonds until the Redevelopment Agencies issue was resolved.

It would appear it has been resolved.

There will be no more redevelopment money coming in. But now the city has to decide if there’s another path to be taken. A larger venue would be fantastic for our community, but now might not be the time to take on such an extravagance.

The idea of a nice downtown hotel makes sense.  Or even some specialty shops, or a bed and breakfast — the downtown railroad station would make a nifty foundation for one. But something needs to be done in that space.

Otherwise, the city has a pretty pricey parking lot in a prime location.

Linda Ryan January 06, 2012 at 11:49 PM
Anyone who makes mean comments like this should identify themselves. Too easy to throw stones.
patty robins January 07, 2012 at 02:04 AM
IM with you, Linda, and I know others are too...anyone, despite their "reasons", that doesnt use their real name can NOT be taken seriously..........H S U F T I and Livermore lover are just pure contrived entertainment, that's for sure ......
lenalex January 07, 2012 at 02:07 AM
Raleigh, I think you missed my point. The problem in San Jose is San Jose itself, not the theaters; for the same reasons people tell me they don't go to San Francisco any more. If you could see the same national or international attraction at a lower ticket price, pay less for a nice restaurant meal, park for free and be home in 20 minutes which location would you choose? Len Alexander Executive Director LVPAC
lenalex January 07, 2012 at 02:15 AM
Too bad they don't use their real names. If they did we might know how to book them. As Patty says, better than Thursday night tv, but I'm sure they have better things to do.
Kristofer Noceda January 07, 2012 at 02:19 AM
Folks we're going to shut down commenting on this column soon. If there's any further questions you have re: regional theater please e-mail me at kristofer.noceda@patch.com and we'll reach out to officials and produce a FAQ report. Have a great weekend, everyone.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »